vastlee.blogg.se

Diskkeeper vs
Diskkeeper vs









  1. Diskkeeper vs install#
  2. Diskkeeper vs plus#
  3. Diskkeeper vs windows#

Diskeeper on a client can also be remotely controlled from Administrator, and Server 2003 is now supported. NTFS can become slower but thats the price you pay for its super advanced ACL and various logging/reporting/transactions/mirroring/compression/encryption features. The only thing that goes for ext4 is its performance while working with a ton of small files. This keeps track of the number of files moved each time Diskeeper is run and dynamically alters the schedule as required. 3 hours ago &0183 &32 NTFS is in an order magnitude more advanced than ext4. The schedule offers plenty of options for regularly running Diskeeper, or you can use the SmartSchedule feature. Administrator still isn’t aware of available drives on each target and simply provides an alphabetical list of drive letters for making multiple choices, or the option to select or exclude all mounted volumes. You can then schedule defrag tasks to individual systems or groups, choose the target drives and decide on the schedule frequency. Groups are created from AD objects or workgroups and administrative access must be provided for all of them. You can either turn off the firewall or modify its settings using the supplied scripts, and deploy them via an Active Directory (AD) group policy – tedious, but necessary. Furthermore, additional DCOM restrictions in SP 2 also affect Administrator’s polling, scheduling and refresh capabilities.

Diskkeeper vs windows#

However, this requires file and print sharing or remote administration enabled on XP client systems, which the new Windows Firewall in Service Pack 2 blocks by default. As before, you can select individual systems or groups and deploy the various Diskeeper products to them using the PushInstall feature. The Getting Started page provides quick links to all the main tasks, and from here you can view the network and gather your client systems into groups for easier management. The main interface is substantially different to its predecessor and far better designed, making it easier to use. The Data Controller service looks after schedules, logging, reporting and alerting information, and the Console provides management access. What’s the difference between Diskeeper, Outbyte, and PerfectDisk Compare Diskeeper vs. Administrator still comprises two components.

Diskkeeper vs install#

Administrator can use an existing SQL 2000 database or will offer to download and install MSDE 2000 from the Diskeeper website. MFT files can be resized in the registry. The basic advantage to third-party defrag apps is the ability to resize the MFT easily and defrag page files, and to run at boot-time when there are no locked files. There’s much more as it can now be managed using more than one console and even supports multiple database instances as well. 3 May not be true in Win7, but in XP, Windows Defrag is Diskeeper Lite (basically). Also, whereas the previous version could only pull job data from managed clients, the latter can now push this data to the system running Administrator 9. No doubt the biggest change to Administrator is the fact that it’s been completely rewritten using C#, and now uses a SQL database to store client data.

Diskkeeper vs plus#

Administrator doesn’t provide any defrag tools and is designed purely for remotely managing installations of Diskeeper Professional and Server, plus looking after defrag schedules on multiple systems.











Diskkeeper vs